1964 Maserati Mistral vs. 1980 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 1980 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Maserati Mistral. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Maserati Mistral would be higher. At 3,486 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Maserati Mistral is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Maserati Mistral (232 HP) has 173 more horse power than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Maserati Mistral should accelerate faster than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Maserati Mistral weights approximately 50 kg more than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Maserati Mistral (315 Nm) has 199 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. (116 Nm). This means 1964 Maserati Mistral will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Maserati Mistral | 1980 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | Maserati | Nissan |
| Model | Mistral | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3486 cc | 1951 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 232 HP | 59 HP |
| Torque | 315 Nm | 116 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Vehicle Weight | 1240 kg | 1190 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2530 mm |
