1964 Maserati Mistral vs. 2006 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2006 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Maserati Mistral. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Maserati Mistral would be higher. At 3,948 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Maserati Mistral (243 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2006 Toyota 4Runner. (236 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Maserati Mistral should accelerate faster than 2006 Toyota 4Runner. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 105 kg more than 1964 Maserati Mistral.
Because 1964 Maserati Mistral is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Maserati Mistral. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota 4Runner, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Maserati Mistral | 2006 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Maserati | Toyota |
Model | Mistral | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1964 | 2006 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3694 cc | 3948 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 243 HP | 236 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1355 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2800 mm |