1964 Maserati Mistral vs. 2010 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2010 Holden Cruze is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Maserati Mistral. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Maserati Mistral would be higher. At 3,694 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Maserati Mistral is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Maserati Mistral (243 HP) has 133 more horse power than 2010 Holden Cruze. (110 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Maserati Mistral should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Cruze.
Because 1964 Maserati Mistral is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Maserati Mistral. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Maserati Mistral | 2010 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Maserati | Holden |
Model | Mistral | Cruze |
Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3694 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 243 HP | 110 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2685 mm |