1964 Maserati Mistral vs. 2013 Nissan Z
To start off, 2013 Nissan Z is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Maserati Mistral. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Maserati Mistral would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Nissan Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Nissan Z (327 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1964 Maserati Mistral. (243 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Nissan Z should accelerate faster than 1964 Maserati Mistral. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Nissan Z weights approximately 323 kg more than 1964 Maserati Mistral. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Maserati Mistral | 2013 Nissan Z | |
Make | Maserati | Nissan |
Model | Mistral | Z |
Year Released | 1964 | 2013 |
Body Type | Convertible | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3694 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 243 HP | 327 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1573 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4246 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1845 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1326 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2550 mm |