1964 Mazda Familia vs. 2009 Renault Clio
To start off, 2009 Renault Clio is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Mazda Familia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Mazda Familia would be higher. At 1,390 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Renault Clio (97 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1964 Mazda Familia. (35 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1964 Mazda Familia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Renault Clio weights approximately 900 kg more than 1964 Mazda Familia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Renault Clio (127 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Mazda Familia. (60 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Mazda Familia.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Mazda Familia | 2009 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | Familia | Clio |
Year Released | 1964 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 782 cc | 1390 cc |
Horse Power | 35 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 60 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 1640 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3770 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2200 mm | 2580 mm |