1964 Mercedes-Benz SL vs. 1986 Plymouth Sundance
To start off, 1986 Plymouth Sundance is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Mercedes-Benz SL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Mercedes-Benz SL would be higher. At 2,306 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Mercedes-Benz SL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Mercedes-Benz SL (148 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1986 Plymouth Sundance. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Mercedes-Benz SL should accelerate faster than 1986 Plymouth Sundance. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Mercedes-Benz SL weights approximately 127 kg more than 1986 Plymouth Sundance. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Mercedes-Benz SL is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Mercedes-Benz SL. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Plymouth Sundance, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Mercedes-Benz SL | 1986 Plymouth Sundance | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Plymouth |
Model | SL | Sundance |
Year Released | 1964 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2306 cc | 2211 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 1175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2470 mm |