1964 Mercedes-Benz SL vs. 1999 Seat Cordoba
To start off, 1999 Seat Cordoba is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Mercedes-Benz SL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Mercedes-Benz SL would be higher. At 2,306 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Mercedes-Benz SL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Mercedes-Benz SL (148 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1999 Seat Cordoba. (123 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Mercedes-Benz SL should accelerate faster than 1999 Seat Cordoba.
Because 1964 Mercedes-Benz SL is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Mercedes-Benz SL. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Seat Cordoba, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Seat Cordoba (321 Nm) has 125 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Mercedes-Benz SL. (196 Nm). This means 1999 Seat Cordoba will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Mercedes-Benz SL.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Mercedes-Benz SL | 1999 Seat Cordoba | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Seat |
| Model | SL | Cordoba |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2306 cc | 1390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 196 Nm | 321 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2520 mm |
