1964 MG 1100 vs. 1952 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn
To start off, 1964 MG 1100 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn would be higher. At 4,566 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn weights approximately 1035 kg more than 1964 MG 1100.
Because 1952 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 MG 1100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 MG 1100 | 1952 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn | |
Make | MG | Rolls-Royce |
Model | 1100 | Silver Dawn |
Year Released | 1964 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 4566 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 825 kg | 1860 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 5170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 3050 mm |