1964 MG 1100 vs. 1963 Simca 1300
To start off, 1964 MG 1100 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Simca 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Simca 1300 would be higher. At 1,290 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Simca 1300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 MG 1100 (53 HP) has 2 more horse power than 1963 Simca 1300. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1964 MG 1100 should accelerate faster than 1963 Simca 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Simca 1300 weights approximately 165 kg more than 1964 MG 1100.
Because 1963 Simca 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Simca 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 MG 1100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Simca 1300 (102 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 MG 1100. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1963 Simca 1300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
1964 MG 1100 | 1963 Simca 1300 | |
Make | MG | Simca |
Model | 1100 | 1300 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1290 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 51 HP |
Torque | 83 Nm | 102 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 825 kg | 990 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2530 mm |