1964 MG 1100 vs. 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 MG 1100 would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 1275 kg more than 1964 MG 1100.
Because 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 MG 1100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 MG 1100 | 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
| Make | MG | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | 1100 | Silver Shadow |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 6230 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 825 kg | 2100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 5180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 3040 mm |
