1964 MG 1100 vs. 1965 Seat 600
To start off, 1965 Seat 600 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 MG 1100 would be higher. At 1,098 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 MG 1100 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 MG 1100 weights approximately 250 kg more than 1965 Seat 600.
Because 1965 Seat 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Seat 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 MG 1100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 MG 1100 (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Seat 600. (47 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1964 MG 1100 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
1964 MG 1100 | 1965 Seat 600 | |
Make | MG | Seat |
Model | 1100 | 600 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 767 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 83 Nm | 47 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 825 kg | 575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2010 mm |