1964 MG 1100 vs. 1982 Opel Ascona
To start off, 1982 Opel Ascona is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 MG 1100 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Opel Ascona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Opel Ascona (81 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1964 MG 1100. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Opel Ascona should accelerate faster than 1964 MG 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Opel Ascona weights approximately 240 kg more than 1964 MG 1100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Opel Ascona (131 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 MG 1100. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1982 Opel Ascona will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 MG 1100 | 1982 Opel Ascona | |
| Make | MG | Opel |
| Model | 1100 | Ascona |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 81 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 83 Nm | 131 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 825 kg | 1065 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2520 mm |
