1964 MG 1100 vs. 1983 Seat Ronda
To start off, 1983 Seat Ronda is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 MG 1100 would be higher. At 1,193 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Seat Ronda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Seat Ronda (62 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1964 MG 1100. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Seat Ronda should accelerate faster than 1964 MG 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Seat Ronda weights approximately 75 kg more than 1964 MG 1100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Seat Ronda (90 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 MG 1100. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1983 Seat Ronda will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
1964 MG 1100 | 1983 Seat Ronda | |
Make | MG | Seat |
Model | 1100 | Ronda |
Year Released | 1964 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1193 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 83 Nm | 90 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 825 kg | 900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4020 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2460 mm |