1964 MG 1100 vs. 1986 Rover 825i
To start off, 1986 Rover 825i is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 MG 1100 would be higher. At 2,493 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Rover 825i is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Rover 825i (170 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1964 MG 1100. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Rover 825i should accelerate faster than 1964 MG 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Rover 825i weights approximately 531 kg more than 1964 MG 1100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Rover 825i (217 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 134 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 MG 1100. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1986 Rover 825i will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 MG 1100 | 1986 Rover 825i | |
| Make | MG | Rover |
| Model | 1100 | 825i |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 2493 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 170 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 83 Nm | 217 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 825 kg | 1356 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2760 mm |
