1964 MG 1100 vs. 1991 Renault Clio
To start off, 1991 Renault Clio is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 MG 1100 would be higher. At 1,794 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Renault Clio (107 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1964 MG 1100. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1964 MG 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Renault Clio weights approximately 200 kg more than 1964 MG 1100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Renault Clio (155 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 MG 1100. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1991 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 MG 1100 | 1991 Renault Clio | |
| Make | MG | Renault |
| Model | 1100 | Clio |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1991 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1794 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 107 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Torque | 83 Nm | 155 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 825 kg | 1025 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 3720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2480 mm |
