1964 MG 1100 vs. 1996 Seat Alhambra
To start off, 1996 Seat Alhambra is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 MG 1100 would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Seat Alhambra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Seat Alhambra (114 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1964 MG 1100. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Seat Alhambra should accelerate faster than 1964 MG 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Seat Alhambra weights approximately 950 kg more than 1964 MG 1100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Seat Alhambra (170 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 MG 1100. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1996 Seat Alhambra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
1964 MG 1100 | 1996 Seat Alhambra | |
Make | MG | Seat |
Model | 1100 | Alhambra |
Year Released | 1964 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 83 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 825 kg | 1775 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2830 mm |