1964 MG 1100 vs. 2000 Proton 400
To start off, 2000 Proton 400 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 MG 1100 would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Proton 400 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Proton 400 (74 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1964 MG 1100. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Proton 400 should accelerate faster than 1964 MG 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Proton 400 weights approximately 145 kg more than 1964 MG 1100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Proton 400 (108 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 MG 1100. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2000 Proton 400 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
1964 MG 1100 | 2000 Proton 400 | |
Make | MG | Proton |
Model | 1100 | 400 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 83 Nm | 108 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 825 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2510 mm |