1964 MG 1100 vs. 2002 Volvo S60
To start off, 2002 Volvo S60 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 MG 1100 would be higher. At 2,319 cc (5 cylinders), 2002 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Volvo S60 (129 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1964 MG 1100. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 1964 MG 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Volvo S60 weights approximately 574 kg more than 1964 MG 1100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Volvo S60 (280 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 197 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 MG 1100. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2002 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
1964 MG 1100 | 2002 Volvo S60 | |
Make | MG | Volvo |
Model | 1100 | S60 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 2319 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 83 Nm | 280 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 825 kg | 1399 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2760 mm |