1964 MG 1100 vs. 2005 Westfield XTR 2
To start off, 2005 Westfield XTR 2 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 MG 1100 would be higher. At 1,297 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Westfield XTR 2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Westfield XTR 2 (173 HP @ 9800 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 1964 MG 1100. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Westfield XTR 2 should accelerate faster than 1964 MG 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 MG 1100 weights approximately 385 kg more than 2005 Westfield XTR 2.
Because 2005 Westfield XTR 2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Westfield XTR 2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 MG 1100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 MG 1100 | 2005 Westfield XTR 2 | |
Make | MG | Westfield |
Model | 1100 | XTR 2 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1297 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 173 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 9800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 825 kg | 440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 3690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2320 mm |