1964 MG 1100 vs. 2006 MG ZT-T
To start off, 2006 MG ZT-T is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 MG 1100 would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 MG ZT-T is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 MG ZT-T (187 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 1964 MG 1100. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 MG ZT-T should accelerate faster than 1964 MG 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 MG ZT-T weights approximately 835 kg more than 1964 MG 1100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 MG ZT-T (245 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 162 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 MG 1100. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 MG ZT-T will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 MG 1100 | 2006 MG ZT-T | |
| Make | MG | MG |
| Model | 1100 | ZT-T |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 2497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 187 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 83 Nm | 245 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 825 kg | 1660 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2750 mm |
