1964 MG 1100 vs. 2006 Toyota Highlander
To start off, 2006 Toyota Highlander is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 MG 1100 would be higher. At 3,310 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Toyota Highlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota Highlander (215 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 162 more horse power than 1964 MG 1100. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Highlander should accelerate faster than 1964 MG 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Toyota Highlander weights approximately 530 kg more than 1964 MG 1100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Toyota Highlander (302 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 219 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 MG 1100. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Toyota Highlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
1964 MG 1100 | 2006 Toyota Highlander | |
Make | MG | Toyota |
Model | 1100 | Highlander |
Year Released | 1964 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 3310 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 215 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 83 Nm | 302 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 825 kg | 1355 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2720 mm |