1964 MG 1100 vs. 2009 Kia Forte
To start off, 2009 Kia Forte is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 MG 1100 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Kia Forte is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Kia Forte (156 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 1964 MG 1100. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Kia Forte should accelerate faster than 1964 MG 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Kia Forte weights approximately 403 kg more than 1964 MG 1100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Kia Forte (195 Nm @ 4300 RPM) has 112 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 MG 1100. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Kia Forte will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
1964 MG 1100 | 2009 Kia Forte | |
Make | MG | Kia |
Model | 1100 | Forte |
Year Released | 1964 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 156 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 83 Nm | 195 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 825 kg | 1228 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4529 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1775 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2649 mm |