1964 MG 1100 vs. 2010 Audi A3
To start off, 2010 Audi A3 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 MG 1100 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Audi A3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Audi A3 (200 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 147 more horse power than 1964 MG 1100. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1964 MG 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Audi A3 weights approximately 635 kg more than 1964 MG 1100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Audi A3 (280 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 197 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 MG 1100. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2010 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
1964 MG 1100 | 2010 Audi A3 | |
Make | MG | Audi |
Model | 1100 | A3 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 83 Nm | 280 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 825 kg | 1460 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4293 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1422 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2578 mm |