1964 MG 1100 vs. 2010 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2010 Toyota Matrix is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 MG 1100 would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Toyota Matrix (132 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1964 MG 1100. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1964 MG 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Toyota Matrix weights approximately 475 kg more than 1964 MG 1100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Toyota Matrix (173 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 MG 1100. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2010 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
1964 MG 1100 | 2010 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | MG | Toyota |
Model | 1100 | Matrix |
Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 132 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 83 Nm | 173 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 825 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4366 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2601 mm |