1964 MG 1100 vs. 2011 Kia Cee'd
To start off, 2011 Kia Cee'd is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 MG 1100 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Kia Cee'd is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Kia Cee'd (138 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1964 MG 1100. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Kia Cee'd should accelerate faster than 1964 MG 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Kia Cee'd weights approximately 615 kg more than 1964 MG 1100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Kia Cee'd (305 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 222 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 MG 1100. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2011 Kia Cee'd will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
1964 MG 1100 | 2011 Kia Cee'd | |
Make | MG | Kia |
Model | 1100 | Cee'd |
Year Released | 1964 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 83 Nm | 305 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 825 kg | 1440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2660 mm |