1964 MG 1100 vs. 2011 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2011 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 MG 1100 would be higher. At 4,367 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Land Rover Range Rover (311 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 258 more horse power than 1964 MG 1100. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1964 MG 1100.
Because 2011 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 MG 1100. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Land Rover Range Rover (700 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 617 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 MG 1100. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2011 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
1964 MG 1100 | 2011 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | MG | Land Rover |
Model | 1100 | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1964 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 4367 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 311 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 83 Nm | 700 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4973 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 2035 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1877 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2891 mm |