1964 MG 1100 vs. 2012 Aston Martin Virage
To start off, 2012 Aston Martin Virage is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 MG 1100 would be higher. At 5,900 cc (12 cylinders), 2012 Aston Martin Virage is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Aston Martin Virage (490 HP) has 437 more horse power than 1964 MG 1100. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Aston Martin Virage should accelerate faster than 1964 MG 1100.
Because 2012 Aston Martin Virage is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Aston Martin Virage. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 MG 1100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Aston Martin Virage (569 Nm) has 486 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 MG 1100. (83 Nm). This means 2012 Aston Martin Virage will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 MG 1100 | 2012 Aston Martin Virage | |
| Make | MG | Aston Martin |
| Model | 1100 | Virage |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 5900 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 490 HP |
| Torque | 83 Nm | 569 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
