1964 MG 1100 vs. 2012 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2012 Jaguar XF is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 MG 1100 would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jaguar XF (187 HP) has 134 more horse power than 1964 MG 1100. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1964 MG 1100.
Because 2012 Jaguar XF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Jaguar XF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 MG 1100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Jaguar XF (450 Nm) has 367 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 MG 1100. (83 Nm). This means 2012 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
1964 MG 1100 | 2012 Jaguar XF | |
Make | MG | Jaguar |
Model | 1100 | XF |
Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 2200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 187 HP |
Torque | 83 Nm | 450 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2908 mm |