1964 MG 1100 vs. 2012 Mazda 2
To start off, 2012 Mazda 2 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 MG 1100 would be higher. At 1,349 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda 2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda 2 (75 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1964 MG 1100. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 2 should accelerate faster than 1964 MG 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mazda 2 weights approximately 205 kg more than 1964 MG 1100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mazda 2 (119 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 MG 1100. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2012 Mazda 2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
1964 MG 1100 | 2012 Mazda 2 | |
Make | MG | Mazda |
Model | 1100 | 2 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1349 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 75 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 83 Nm | 119 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 825 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1695 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1475 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2489 mm |