1964 MG 1100 vs. 2012 Mercedes-Benz R
To start off, 2012 Mercedes-Benz R is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 MG 1100 would be higher. At 2,987 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Mercedes-Benz R is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mercedes-Benz R (187 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 1964 MG 1100. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mercedes-Benz R should accelerate faster than 1964 MG 1100.
Because 2012 Mercedes-Benz R is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 MG 1100. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mercedes-Benz R will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mercedes-Benz R (440 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 357 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 MG 1100. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2012 Mercedes-Benz R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
1964 MG 1100 | 2012 Mercedes-Benz R | |
Make | MG | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 1100 | R |
Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 2987 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 187 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 83 Nm | 440 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 5156 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1958 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1661 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 3216 mm |