1964 MG 1100 vs. 2013 Lincoln MKS
To start off, 2013 Lincoln MKS is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 MG 1100 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Lincoln MKS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Lincoln MKS (301 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 248 more horse power than 1964 MG 1100. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Lincoln MKS should accelerate faster than 1964 MG 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Lincoln MKS weights approximately 1091 kg more than 1964 MG 1100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Lincoln MKS (380 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 297 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 MG 1100. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2013 Lincoln MKS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
1964 MG 1100 | 2013 Lincoln MKS | |
Make | MG | Lincoln |
Model | 1100 | MKS |
Year Released | 1964 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 301 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 83 Nm | 380 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 825 kg | 1916 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 5222 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 2172 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1565 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2868 mm |