1964 MG 1100 vs. 2013 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2013 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 MG 1100 would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mazda CX-9 (269 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 216 more horse power than 1964 MG 1100. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1964 MG 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 1102 kg more than 1964 MG 1100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 283 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 MG 1100. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2013 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
1964 MG 1100 | 2013 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | MG | Mazda |
Model | 1100 | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 3726 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 269 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 83 Nm | 366 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 825 kg | 1927 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 5108 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1936 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1728 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2875 mm |