1964 MG MGC vs. 1997 Rover 414i
To start off, 1997 Rover 414i is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 MG MGC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 MG MGC would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 MG MGC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 MG MGC (149 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1997 Rover 414i. (103 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 MG MGC should accelerate faster than 1997 Rover 414i.
Because 1964 MG MGC is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 MG MGC. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Rover 414i, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 MG MGC (174 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Rover 414i. (167 Nm). This means 1964 MG MGC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Rover 414i.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 MG MGC | 1997 Rover 414i | |
| Make | MG | Rover |
| Model | MGC | 414i |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1399 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 149 HP | 103 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4300 RPM |
| Torque | 174 Nm | 167 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
