1964 MG MGC vs. 2002 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2002 Honda CR-V is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 MG MGC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 MG MGC would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 MG MGC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Honda CR-V (160 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1964 MG MGC. (149 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1964 MG MGC.
Because 2002 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 MG MGC. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Honda CR-V (218 Nm) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 MG MGC. (174 Nm). This means 2002 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 MG MGC.
Compare all specifications:
1964 MG MGC | 2002 Honda CR-V | |
Make | MG | Honda |
Model | MGC | CR-V |
Year Released | 1964 | 2002 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 2359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 149 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 174 Nm | 218 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |