1964 MG MGC vs. 2002 Saab 03-Sep
To start off, 2002 Saab 03-Sep is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 MG MGC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 MG MGC would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 MG MGC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 MG MGC (149 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2002 Saab 03-Sep. (148 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 MG MGC should accelerate faster than 2002 Saab 03-Sep.
Because 1964 MG MGC is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 MG MGC. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Saab 03-Sep, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Saab 03-Sep (241 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 MG MGC. (174 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2002 Saab 03-Sep will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 MG MGC.
Compare all specifications:
1964 MG MGC | 2002 Saab 03-Sep | |
Make | MG | Saab |
Model | MGC | 03-Sep |
Year Released | 1964 | 2002 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1985 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 149 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 174 Nm | 241 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |