1964 MG MGC vs. 2005 Volvo S40
To start off, 2005 Volvo S40 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 MG MGC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 MG MGC would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 MG MGC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volvo S40 (218 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1964 MG MGC. (149 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volvo S40 should accelerate faster than 1964 MG MGC.
Because 1964 MG MGC is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 MG MGC. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Volvo S40, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Volvo S40 (340 Nm) has 166 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 MG MGC. (174 Nm). This means 2005 Volvo S40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 MG MGC.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 MG MGC | 2005 Volvo S40 | |
| Make | MG | Volvo |
| Model | MGC | S40 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2912 cc | 2435 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 149 HP | 218 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 174 Nm | 340 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
