1964 MG MGC vs. 2006 Smart ForFour
To start off, 2006 Smart ForFour is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 MG MGC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 MG MGC would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 MG MGC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 MG MGC (149 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 2006 Smart ForFour. (94 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 MG MGC should accelerate faster than 2006 Smart ForFour.
Because 1964 MG MGC is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 MG MGC. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Smart ForFour, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 MG MGC (174 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Smart ForFour. (125 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1964 MG MGC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Smart ForFour.
Compare all specifications:
1964 MG MGC | 2006 Smart ForFour | |
Make | MG | Smart |
Model | MGC | ForFour |
Year Released | 1964 | 2006 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1332 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 149 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 174 Nm | 125 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |