1964 MG MGC vs. 2010 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XK is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 MG MGC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 MG MGC would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XK (510 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 361 more horse power than 1964 MG MGC. (149 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1964 MG MGC.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jaguar XK (624 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 450 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 MG MGC. (174 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2010 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 MG MGC. 2010 Jaguar XK has automatic transmission and 1964 MG MGC has manual transmission. 1964 MG MGC will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Jaguar XK will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1964 MG MGC | 2010 Jaguar XK | |
Make | MG | Jaguar |
Model | MGC | XK |
Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 149 HP | 510 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 174 Nm | 624 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |