1964 Mini Countryman vs. 2013 Mercedes-Benz E
To start off, 2013 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Mini Countryman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Mini Countryman would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mercedes-Benz E (298 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 264 more horse power than 1964 Mini Countryman. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1964 Mini Countryman.
Because 2013 Mercedes-Benz E is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Mercedes-Benz E. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Mini Countryman, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mercedes-Benz E (370 Nm @ 5250 RPM) has 310 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Mini Countryman. (60 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2013 Mercedes-Benz E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Mini Countryman.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Mini Countryman | 2013 Mercedes-Benz E | |
Make | Mini | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Countryman | E |
Year Released | 1964 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | W |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 6 valves |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 298 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 60 Nm | 370 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |