1964 Mini MK I vs. 1982 Toyota Camry
To start off, 1982 Toyota Camry is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Mini MK I would be higher. At 1,973 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Toyota Camry is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Toyota Camry (106 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1964 Mini MK I. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Toyota Camry should accelerate faster than 1964 Mini MK I. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Toyota Camry weights approximately 482 kg more than 1964 Mini MK I. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Toyota Camry (166 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 106 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Mini MK I. (60 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1982 Toyota Camry will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Mini MK I.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Mini MK I | 1982 Toyota Camry | |
Make | Mini | Toyota |
Model | MK I | Camry |
Year Released | 1964 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 1973 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 60 Nm | 166 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 618 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2610 mm |