1964 Mini MK I vs. 1992 Renault 19
To start off, 1992 Renault 19 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Mini MK I would be higher. At 1,171 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Renault 19 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Renault 19 (57 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1964 Mini MK I. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Renault 19 should accelerate faster than 1964 Mini MK I. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Renault 19 weights approximately 387 kg more than 1964 Mini MK I. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Renault 19 (85 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Mini MK I. (60 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1992 Renault 19 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Mini MK I.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Mini MK I | 1992 Renault 19 | |
Make | Mini | Renault |
Model | MK I | 19 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 1171 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 57 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 60 Nm | 85 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 618 kg | 1005 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2550 mm |