1964 Mitsubishi 500 vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 1982 Zastava 102 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Mitsubishi 500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Mitsubishi 500 would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Zastava 102 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Zastava 102 (49 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1964 Mitsubishi 500. (23 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Zastava 102 should accelerate faster than 1964 Mitsubishi 500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Zastava 102 weights approximately 236 kg more than 1964 Mitsubishi 500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1982 Zastava 102 (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Mitsubishi 500. (34 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1982 Zastava 102 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Mitsubishi 500.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Mitsubishi 500 | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Zastava |
| Model | 500 | 102 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1982 |
| Engine Size | 594 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 23 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 34 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 534 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3170 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2070 mm | 2160 mm |
