1964 Mitsubishi 500 vs. 1999 Renault Megan
To start off, 1999 Renault Megan is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Mitsubishi 500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Mitsubishi 500 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Renault Megan is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1964 Mitsubishi 500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Mitsubishi 500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Renault Megan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Mitsubishi 500 | 1999 Renault Megan | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Renault |
Model | 500 | Megan |
Year Released | 1964 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 594 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 23 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |