1964 Mitsubishi 500 vs. 2007 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2007 Toyota Tundra is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Mitsubishi 500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Mitsubishi 500 would be higher. At 4,664 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Toyota Tundra (271 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 248 more horse power than 1964 Mitsubishi 500. (23 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1964 Mitsubishi 500.
Because 2007 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Mitsubishi 500. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Toyota Tundra (424 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 390 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Mitsubishi 500. (34 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2007 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Mitsubishi 500.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Mitsubishi 500 | 2007 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Toyota |
Model | 500 | Tundra |
Year Released | 1964 | 2007 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 594 cc | 4664 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 23 HP | 271 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 34 Nm | 424 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 3170 mm | 5820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2070 mm | 3710 mm |