1964 Moretti 2500 vs. 2009 Holden Epica
To start off, 2009 Holden Epica is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Moretti 2500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Moretti 2500 would be higher. At 2,454 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Moretti 2500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 5 more horse power than 1964 Moretti 2500. (143 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1964 Moretti 2500.
Because 1964 Moretti 2500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Moretti 2500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 133 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Moretti 2500. (187 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Moretti 2500.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Moretti 2500 | 2009 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Moretti | Holden |
| Model | 2500 | Epica |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2454 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 143 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 187 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2700 mm |
