1964 Morgan 4 vs. 1967 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 1967 Riley Kestrel is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Morgan 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Morgan 4 would be higher. At 1,340 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Morgan 4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Riley Kestrel (57 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1964 Morgan 4. (55 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Riley Kestrel should accelerate faster than 1964 Morgan 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Riley Kestrel weights approximately 255 kg more than 1964 Morgan 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Morgan 4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Morgan 4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Riley Kestrel, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Morgan 4 | 1967 Riley Kestrel | |
Make | Morgan | Riley |
Model | 4 | Kestrel |
Year Released | 1964 | 1967 |
Engine Size | 1340 cc | 1275 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 55 HP | 57 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 915 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2380 mm |