1964 Morgan 4 vs. 1986 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 1986 Nissan Pulsar is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Morgan 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Morgan 4 would be higher. At 1,340 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Morgan 4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Nissan Pulsar (59 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1964 Morgan 4. (55 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Nissan Pulsar should accelerate faster than 1964 Morgan 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Nissan Pulsar weights approximately 205 kg more than 1964 Morgan 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Morgan 4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Morgan 4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Nissan Pulsar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Morgan 4 | 1986 Nissan Pulsar | |
Make | Morgan | Nissan |
Model | 4 | Pulsar |
Year Released | 1964 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1340 cc | 1270 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 55 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 865 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2420 mm |