1964 Morgan 4 vs. 1996 Rover 200
To start off, 1996 Rover 200 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Morgan 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Morgan 4 would be higher. At 1,794 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Rover 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Rover 200 (143 HP @ 6750 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1964 Morgan 4. (55 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 1964 Morgan 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Rover 200 weights approximately 400 kg more than 1964 Morgan 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Morgan 4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Morgan 4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Rover 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Morgan 4 | 1996 Rover 200 | |
Make | Morgan | Rover |
Model | 4 | 200 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1340 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 55 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1060 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2510 mm |