1964 Morgan 4 vs. 2003 Mazda 3
To start off, 2003 Mazda 3 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Morgan 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Morgan 4 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda 3 (160 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1964 Morgan 4. (55 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1964 Morgan 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 3 weights approximately 580 kg more than 1964 Morgan 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Morgan 4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Morgan 4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Morgan 4 | 2003 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Morgan | Mazda |
Model | 4 | 3 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1340 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 55 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1240 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2850 mm |