1964 Morgan 4 vs. 2006 Volvo S80
To start off, 2006 Volvo S80 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Morgan 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Morgan 4 would be higher. At 2,520 cc (5 cylinders), 2006 Volvo S80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Volvo S80 (207 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 152 more horse power than 1964 Morgan 4. (55 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Volvo S80 should accelerate faster than 1964 Morgan 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Volvo S80 weights approximately 916 kg more than 1964 Morgan 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Morgan 4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Morgan 4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volvo S80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Morgan 4 | 2006 Volvo S80 | |
Make | Morgan | Volvo |
Model | 4 | S80 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1340 cc | 2520 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 55 HP | 207 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1576 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2800 mm |